Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election. Show all posts

Friday, 19 August 2016

Zambia’s Referendum Fails As Less Than 50% Of Voters Show Up

By Paul Shalala
A voter

Zambia has failed to pass several progressive human rights amendments to its constitution following the failure by voters to reach the 50% threshold needed to approve the amendments in a referendum.

On Thursday last week, Zambia went to the polls in a general election which was also tied to a referendum on the bill of rights which had progressive laws.

Due to the attention given to the presidential election, the counting and announcing of referendum votes was halted and postponed to today to allow for the presidential results to be announced first.

According to Zambia’s Referendum Act, the country needs at least 50% of its citizens above 18 years to vote in a referendum.

Further, half of those who show up at the polling stations must vote YES for the referendum to succeed.

However, today, the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) announced that last week’s referendum failed to reach the threshold.

ECZ Chairperson Esau Chulu disclosed that only 44.4% of the eligible voters turn out and the referendum failed by 5.6%.

According to the Central Statistical Office, Zambia has an estimated total of 7,528,091 people above the age of 18 and this means that for the referendum to go through, 3,764,046 should have voted.

However, according to Justice Chulu, only 3,345,047 showed up and of those, only 1,852,549 voted YES for the referendum.

The ECZ and some civil society organisations ran sensitisation campaigns urging people to come out and vote in the referendum.

The ruling Patriotic Front campaigned for a YES vote while the opposition UPND and other parties campaigned for a NO vote.

Despite the general election recording a 56.4% turn out, the referendum recorded a 44.4%.

After voting for President, Member of Parliament, Mayor and Councillor, some voters did not proceed to the referendum booth to also vote in the referendum despite both processes being held in the same polling stations.
The Referendum Question On the ballot Paper

Some of the progressive laws which were provided for in the bill of rights were a provision of 19 years as the marriage age, banning of abortion, providing access to information, freedom of the media, social, economic, cultural and political rights and fair trial.

Since the announcement of the referendum results, some Copperbelt-based civil society organisations have told this blogger of their disappointment.

“We are disappointed that the referendum has failed. We had hope that if the bill of rights was passed, we were going to be granted access to information which we have been championing for years. We also hoped that the public media would be given freedom. But this now means we get back to our drawing boards and start pushing parliament to enact the access to information bill,” said Andrew Sakala, President of the Press Association of Zambia.

Since 2002, the Zambian media has been involved ina back and forth game with governments for the access to information law to be taken back to parliament for enactment.

Not much progress has been made in realising this dream as successful governments have been failing to take back the bill to the floor of the house since its withdrawal from the standing orders 14 years ago.

For those involved in governance issues, the failure of the referendum means a major setback to their countrywide advocacy activities in the past three months.

“We are very disappointed by this development. We blame opposition parties who politicised this process. They campaigned against the referendum and now the people of Zambia have been denied their social, economic and cultural rights. This should be a lesson to Zambians and they should know that some parties don’t mean well,” said Gerard Mutelo, President of the Kitwe-based Democratic Governance and Human Rights Advocates.  

For some governance activists, the failure by Zambian voters to pass the bill of rights has hurt them hard.

“We are disappointed and annoyed. We spent a lot of money in sensitising the masses. What have the opposition parties gained in this…… People are not celebrating this development…. What have they achieved?” said an angry looking Poster Jumbe, the Copperbelt Province Coordinator of the Anti-Voter Apathy Project, a youth-led organisation which champions the involvement of young people in public affairs.
Some of the advocacy material for referendum

Among other provisions, the bill of rights called suggested 19 years to be made the marriage age in light of the conflict between customary and statutory laws which recognise marriage at different ages.

“It is very disappointing that the bill of rights has not been passed. We hoped that if it passed, it would have raised the marriage age to 19 and helped stop early marriages which are rampant in Zambia,” said Sharon Chisanga, the Copperbelt Province Coordinator for the Young Women Christian Association.

Ms Chisanga coordinates several programs aimed at discouraging early marriages which are common on the Copperbelt Province which has the second highest rate among Zambia’s 10 provinces.

If passed, the bill of rights would have also outlawed the detention of pregnant women.

Currently, pregnant women can be jailed and several women are incarcerated and raise their children in prison.

The bill had also provided for quick trials to avoid the common practice of suspects spending months and possibly years before their cases are disposed off by the courts of law.

With Zambia's conservative society, the country added a clause which defined marriage as union between two people of opposite sex.

This clause was clearly stated to avoid any chances of same sex marriages in a country which is constitutionally recognised as a christian nation even though it also respects other faiths.

Before Thursday’s referendum, the last time Zambia had such a vote was in 1969. 

Sunday, 31 July 2016

Lessons Zambian Parties Can Learn From US Party Conventions

FRONTRUNNERS: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton
By Paul Shalala in Syracuse, New York

The past two weeks have been very political on all major TV networks here in the United States.

This is the period when the two major political parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, hold their conventions to select their nominees for the November 8 Presidential election.

These conventions were covered live by all major TV networks.

A week ago, the Republicans held their convention in Cleveland, Ohio where real estate mogul Donald Trump was confirmed as the party’s nominee.

This past week, it was the turn for the Democrats who converged in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where they nominated former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as the party’s torch bearer for the polls.

Having found myself glued to CNN, Fox News and MSNBC throughout these past weeks, I have learnt about party conventions in the US.

I have also noted a number of parallels with the way conventions are held back home.
In this article, I will try to bring out some of the issues that I feel can help foster democracy and perfect the intra-party democracy in the great nation of Zambia.

The Nomination Process

The nomination of a presidential nominee is a long process in the USA.

Prospective candidates or their supporters form what are called PACs (Political Action Committees) way before the actual nomination process begins.

Because elections in the US are expensive, candidates are expected to raise a lot of money to fund their campaigns and publish the figures for transparency’s sake.

The PACs are usually in the forefront raising millions of dollars to help the campaigns, but by law, they cannot raise more than a certain limit.

In the early stages, candidates hold town hall meetings, address rallies and issue political statements.

The media later gets involved and organise debates.

For example, last year when the TV debates commenced, some Republican candidates were left out because opinion polls had shown that they had no enough nationwide support for them to debate live on TV.

Then comes the primaries and caucus in all the fifty states of the USA.

In these contests, mere party members vote among their candidates just like in a national election.
An American voting during primary elections

Voters are only eligible to vote in the primaries if they are registered as a member of a certain party in the area and they cannot vote across party lines except in a normal election.

Both the Democrats and Republican simultaneously have these primaries and caucuses.

Rules are different from state to state but the nomination process is such that a candidate can only become a nominee in the Democratic party if he or she polls at least 2,382 delegates during the campaigns.

For the Republicans, the magic number is 1,237 delegates.

Just like during the US Presidential election where voters don’t vote direct for the candidate but vote for people who form the electoral college, voters in a caucus vote for people who will elect the party’s nominee at the convention.

It should be noted that in this process, there are delegates who are bound with their vote and once they vote, they cannot change their mind in case the nomination process is contested at the convention.

There are also super delegates, especially among democrats, who are free to choose for themselves and can change their vote as and when they feel like.

It is a complicated procedure which Donald Trump, when he was still the Republican party’s presumptive nominee, described as a ‘rigged’ process.

If during the Caucuses none of the candidates amasses enough votes to reach the threshold to become the party’s nominee, then the issue can be taken to the floor of the convention and hold what American call a contested convention.

Basically, at a contested convention, candidates will start lobbying delegates for fresh votes until a nominee is elected.

Parallel to this, in Zambia the selection of a party’s presidential candidate is done at a convention with delegates (party officials) from all the ten provinces meeting in one place and voting.

In Zambia we call those wishing to contest on the party ticket as presidential aspirants while in the US they call them presidential candidates.

When the party chooses the person to represent them in the elections, in Zambia we call them presidential candidates but in the US it’s a party nominee.

What I have learnt from the nomination process in the US is that local people (not party officials in Zambia) have the responsibility of choosing their party nominees.

This is power to the people.

Selection Of Vice President Nominee

Just like in Zambia where we now have a Vice President who is a running mate to the President candidate, Americans also have a running mate who they call Nominee Vice President or Vice President Nominee.

Donald Trump and Mike Pence
The selection for this nominee in the US is a secret but slow process.

It involves interviews for possible candidates and doing a lot of background checks.
The media is kept at bay but there is always speculation as to who is likely to be picked.

Back home, the selection of a running mate is a preserve of the party president.

All the nine running mates for the August 11 Presidential polls were selected by the Presidential candidates with little or no input from their respective parties.

In our context, this is done to give the presidential candidate the freedom to choose the person they will be comfortable to work with.

In the US, the Vice Presidential nominee is supposed to add value and some level of support to the party nominee.

In 2008, Democratic nominee Barack Obama, a first term Senator from Illinois chose Joe Bide as his vice president nominee to help him add foreign policy credentials to his campaign and experience in running affairs of government.

This year, we have seen Donald Trump choosing Mike Pence, Governor of Indiana as his Vice President.
Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine

He did so because Pence has some public service credentials which the wealthy New York businessman lacks.

For Hillary Clinton, she chose Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia because he is seen as a conservative who can appeal to frustrated Republicans and eat away part of Trump’s possible votes.

Added to that, Senator Kaine speaks Spanish and can bring on board millions of Hispanics who fear Trump following his promise to crackdown on undocumented migrants, mostly Mexicans.

The Role Of Losing Candidates

Following the conclusion of the long and painful period of selecting a party’s nominee, the tradition in the US is that losing candidates rally behind the nominee and work for the good of their party.
Bernie Sanders

In 2008 when Obama beat Clinton to be the Democratic Party’s nominee, the former New York Senator gave a moving speech at the Democratic National Convention and endorsed the man who would later become the first ever African-American President.

This year, we saw this same tradition manifesting itself.

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who lost to Clinton, made a moving speech at the convention and endorsed the former First Lady.
Ted Cruz after he addressed the Republican convention

He even moved a motion to unanimously endorse her as the party’s flag bearer in the November poll.

Senator Sanders did this despite thousands of his supporters who called on him to continue his ‘revolution’ to reform Wall Street, reform healthcare and the education system.

His supporters kept chanting ‘Bernie’ ‘Bernie’ ‘Bernie’ but in the spirit of unity, he put aside his interest and endorsed his rival.

Even after the leak of emails from the Democratic National Committee showing revealing the party leadership’s preference for Clinton, Senator Sanders attended the four day convention and was part of all proceedings.

John Kasich
However, on the Republican side, the losing candidate Ted Cruz did the actual opposite.

When he was given chance speak at the convention, the Senator from Texas reassured his supporters of his continued fight but he did not endorse Trump.

This however did not go well with Trump supporters who booed him.

Other losing presidential candidates John Kasich and Jeb Bush did not pitch up at the convention.

Despite hosting the convention, Kasich, the Governor of Ohio where the Republican National Convention was held in the city of Cleveland, refused to attend the four day event saying Trump was a wrong candidate for the party.
Jeb Bush

Despite these two parallel scenarios, the Zambian picture is usually different.
Most aspirants who are left out of the presidential race leave their parties and join others or better still form their own parties.

Currently, we have several parties formed by individuals who had presidential ambitions but were beaten by other candidates.

The lesson I learnt from losing candidates here is that politicians must be attached to their parties because of ideology and not the need for them to be on the Presidential ballot.

The Role Of Families

From my research, families seem to play a big role in the campaigns in the US.

Take for example the Trump family which is heavily involved in every aspect of the Republican campaign.
The Trump Family

Trump’s wife Melania, his children Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany and Trump Jr spoke at the convention.

Even though Melania’s speech plagiarised Michelle Obama’s speech she delivered in 2008, her role at the convention was very prominent.

The Trump children are also said to have been very much involved in the dismissal of a number of campaign leaders and in shaping their father’s public image and utterances.

In particular, Ivanka has been telling his father to be more ‘presidential’ and avoid his outbursts on almost everything.

According to recent US media reports, Ivanka’s name even popped up among the possible Vice President nominees for her father due to her influence.
The Clinton Family

In the Clinton camp, her husband Bill and their only child Chelsea are also fully involved in the campaigns.

Bill, the former US President, has been holding campaigns rallied for his wife, hoping to woo her more support and become the first ever US President to also serve as First Gentleman, a title given to men who are married to female Presidents.

Chelsea, now a mother of two, spoke at the Convention and painted her mother as a caring parent, determined lawyer and public servant who dedicates her life to serving others.

Back home, relatives of presidential candidates are usually not allowed to be in the forefront of campaigns for fear of it being seen as a family affair.

Protests At Conventions

America is often referred to as the land of the free.

During the two respective conventions, organisers had to deal with protesters both inside and outside the convention halls.
Supporters display Sanders posters at the convention

At the Democratic National Convention, the protesters were supporters of Senator Sanders who felt cheated by their party following the leak of emails which exposed the long suspected ‘fixing’ of the delegate count to ensure Clinton clinches the nomination.

Inside the Convention hall, some delegates, especially in the first three days, carried posters of the Vermont Senator and kept shouting his name as countless people spoke.

At some point, even people addressing the event had to pause a bit due to the protesters’ determination to be heard.

Even when President Barack Obama addressed the event on Wednesday, he recognised their efforts: “Let’s be as vocal as Bernie’s supporters.”

Outside the convention hall, dozens of supporters of Senator Sanders held their protests and occasionally clashed with Police.

At the Republican National Convention a week earlier, protesters showed up both inside and outside the convention hall.

Inside the hall, supporters of Senator Cruz were vocal and most of them were from his home state of Texas.  

Protesters outside the Republican Convention
Outside the convention hall, people from all walks of life protested against Trump’s campaign messages such as building a wall on the Mexican border, his mocking of disabled people and derogatory statements against women.

Despite all this, the rights of the protesters were respected because: America is a land of the free.

But can such protests from supporters of losing presidential candidates be tolerated in our Zambia at party conventions?

Your guess is as good as mine.

Intelligence Briefings and Secret Service Protection

In America, when a political party chooses its nominee, that person is entitled to receiving occasional intelligence briefings which the President of the USA also receives.

However, the intelligence is limited and not much is given to them.

This is done to make them aware of the threats the country is facing and prepare them for possible office.

On top of that, presidential candidates are also given secret service protection.
This is done to protect them from possible threats as they transverse the country to woo voters.

The Secret Service is a security agency which offers security to the US President, Vice President and their families.

Elections and the Transition

Now that the Republicans have settled for Donald Trump and the Democrats picked Clinton, the die has been cast.
Dr. Jill Stein

But these are not the only candidates who complete the presidential ballot for November 8.

The Green Party is floating a medical doctor Jill Stein while the Libertarian Party has nominated former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson.

The four will be subjected to more than two live debates between now and November.

These intense and long debates are an avenue through which voters hear policies and campaign messages.

Pollsters also use these debates as an opportunity to ask voters what they think about their candidates’ standing on various issues and then they collect opinion polls.

Gary Johnson
Whoever wins on November 8 will have to work with President Obama’s administration (government) during the transition period until he or she is sworn in on January 20, 2017

Usually, the President-elect chooses a transition team which works with the outgoing administration to smoothen the transition process before the inauguration.

Conclusion

Conventions in the US are an important aspect of intra-party democracy.

They bring together party members who listen to speeches from various people.

The speakers are both party members and non party members.

With various things Zambian politicians can learn from the US, it is important that true democracy is embraced when selecting presidential candidates.

American democracy is today seen to be one of the best because it has evolved over the past 240 years since the country’s founding fathers kicked out the English colonialists.

Zambia’s democracy is only 25 years old and it is still growing.

Even though our democracy maybe in its infancy, we the Zambians have demonstrated to the world that we are free thinkers, we respect the verdict of the people through the ballot box, political parties which lose power easily hand over government to the victor and our transitions are always peaceful.

Americans may have perfected their democracy but we too are on course and one day we will reach there.

Saturday, 30 July 2016

FODEP To Deploy 5,000 Election Monitors Across Zambia

A voter being helped inside a Polling Station
By Paul Shalala

The Foundation for Democratic Process (FODEP) says it will deploy 5,000 election monitors in 96 of Zambia’s 156 constituencies.

In a press statement, FODEP Executive Director Chimfwembe Mweenge said the training of the monitors had commenced ahead of the August 11 general elections and referendum.

“The trainings are expected to finish on August 3, 2016 and will see a total of 5000 citizen election monitors trained and these will be deployed to 96 constituencies across all the 10 provinces,” said Mr Mweenge.

He adds that the organisation has just finished conducting the training of trainers programme across the 10 provinces in which 175 individuals at district and constituency levels.

FODEP is confident that its monitors will be adequately equipped to monitor and observe the elections impartially and independently in accordance with provisions of electoral regulations.

The Lusaka-based governance organisation has been monitoring elections in Zambia and the region for over two decades.

It joins several other local and international election monitoring groups who are deploying their observers to observe the polls.