By Paul Shalala
In the past two months, the Zambian media has been dominated
by the debate on whether President Michael Sata has the moral right to appoint
opposition Members of Parliament to serve in his government as Deputy Ministers.
On Monday, one MMD MP who was serving as a Deputy Minister
resigned from his ministerial position after pressure from his party. The
following day, President Sata appointed two more MMD MPs to serve in his
government and on Wednesday, the MMD’s National Executive Committee is set to
meet and decide the fate of all its MPs who are serving in the PF government,
possibly expelling them.
Legally, the 1991 Zambian constitution as amended in 1996
allows the head of state to appoint MPs from within the legislature. The
constitution does however not state from which party the president can appoint
making it easy for Mr Sata to appoint across the board. Therefore, the
president does not break any law by appointing opposition MPs.
But why is Mr Sata targeting MMD MPs only? Below are some of
the points which could be behind the president’s continuous appointments from
within the MMD.
NUMBERS
The ruling Patriotic Front does not have the numbers to pass
laws on its own. The opposition actually has the power to bring a deadlock in
the house, they have the numbers. The PF has less than the two thirds majority
(106 MPs) which is needed to control parliament without any problem from
backbenchers. It is this lack of the two thirds majority which somehow is
pushing the PF to continuously court MMD MPs.
Once these opposition MPs are
appointed as Ministers, they shift seats to the right of the Speaker and
subsequently change their pattern of voting in parliament, giving an advantage
to the PF which has few seats. Therefore, its all sweet for Dr Guy Scott,
leader of government business in the house, when an opposition MP shifts camp
in Parliament.
Loyalty
The other reason why MMD MPs are easily appointed by
President Sata is the fact that the head of state is seen as a product of the MMD,
a party he led as National Secretary before ditched it and formed the Patriotic
Front. This realization makes it easy for MMD MPs to become loyal to the
President than UPND MPs who would not accept such an offer. Loyalty to the
system makes it easy for the PF to have it easy in the house.
Dominancy
By appointing opposition MPs into his government, President
Sata is ensuring PF’s dominancy over the political scene. Dominancy for the PF
is necessary as every ruling party needs it to suppress the opposition. But in
cases where it’s a coalition government, this dominancy is not counted as an
opposition party fully agrees to join government. By having opposition MPs
within his ranks, President Sata will continue to dominate politics both
nationally and within the party.
Divisions in MMD
President Sata seems to be appointing only MMD MPs after
realizing that the MMD seems to be the most divided opposition political party
in the country. The UPND with its 29 MPs seems united against any of its MPs serving
in the PF government, it has actually made it clear it would not tolerate such
a move and would instantly expel any of its MPs who would ‘go to bed’ with the
ruling party. But the MMD, the major opposition party in the house, is divided
on this matter.
Some sections of this former ruling party agree to their MPs
sharing power with the ruling PF due to the party’s own legacy which stems from
the Levy Mwanawasa era. However, another section of MMD is publicly opposed to
those MPs who are serving in government. It is this YES and NO situation in MMD
which to some extent has convinced the president to use MMD as a leverage for
his control of Manda Hill.
Conclusion
As long as the Zambian constitution allows ministers to be
appointed from within parliament, this horse trading will continue. Ruling
parties will continue dominating the opposition in a bid to control the house
and pass critical laws. However, with the new draft constitution suggesting the
appointment of ministers from outside parliament, this culture of ‘poaching’
opposition MPs is likely to end as only technocrats will be serving in
ministerial portfolios.
The other point you miss out is that UPND will gain popularity by having its members in such positions. Also where the MMD holds a position, the PF can easily penetrate if a by-election is called for as opposed to UPND die hard areas.
ReplyDelete